netdev - Re: [PATCH] mac80211_hwsim: indicate support for 60GHz channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:09:53 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Ramon Fontes <ramonreisfontes@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211_hwsim: indicate support for 60GHz channels

On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 12:06 -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> > Advertise 60GHz channels to mac80211.
> Oh.. That was a mistake. Sorry for that.
> 
> Anyway, can we indicate 60GHz support even though it is not being
> supported by mac80211 yet?
> 
No, that makes no sense. DMG operation is significantly different from
non-DMG operation, even the A-MSDU format for example (an abbreviated
format called "short A-MSDU" is used in DMG). Similarly beacons, etc.,
all kinds of operations are significantly different.

Adding 60 GHz channels to hwsim would be essentially operating as non-
DMG yet on a DMG channel, which makes no sense.

I don't think anyone's planning to add DMG support to mac80211, and in
the absence of a real driver requiring that it wouldn't make sense
anyway. Quite possibly, it simply doesn't make sense period, because DMG
operation is sufficiently different.

johannes