netdev - RE: [PATCH v4 05/23] ice: Add devlink params support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:21:08 +0000
From:   "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
To:     Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lacombe, John S" <john.s.lacombe@...el.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
        "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
        "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 05/23] ice: Add devlink params support

> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 05/23] ice: Add devlink params support
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Saleem, Shiraz <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 8:11 PM
> [..]
> 
> > > > > Parav is talking about generic ways to customize the aux devices
> > > > > created and that would seem to serve the same function as this.
> > > >
> > > > Is there an RFC or something posted for us to look at?
> > > I do not have polished RFC content ready yet.
> > > But coping the full config sequence snippet from the internal draft
> > > (changed for ice
> > > example) here as I like to discuss with you in this context.
> >
> > Thanks Parav! Some comments below.
> >
> > >
> > > # (1) show auxiliary device types supported by a given devlink device.
> > > # applies to pci pf,vf,sf. (in general at devlink instance).
> > > $ devlink dev auxdev show pci/0000:06.00.0
> > > pci/0000:06.00.0:
> > >   current:
> > >     roce eth
> > >   new:
> > >   supported:
> > >     roce eth iwarp
> > >
> > > # (2) enable iwarp and ethernet type of aux devices and disable roce.
> > > $ devlink dev auxdev set pci/0000:06:00.0 roce off iwarp on
> > >
> > > # (3) now see which aux devices will be enable on next reload.
> > > $ devlink dev auxdev show pci/0000:06:00.0
> > > pci/0000:06:00.0:
> > >   current:
> > >     roce eth
> > >   new:
> > >     eth iwarp
> > >   supported:
> > >     roce eth iwarp
> > >
> > > # (4) now reload the device and see which aux devices are created.
> > > At this point driver undergoes reconfig for removal of roce and
> > > adding
> > iwarp.
> > > $ devlink reload pci/0000:06:00.0
> >
> > I see this is modeled like devlink resource.
> >
> > Do we really to need a PCI driver re-init to switch the type of the
> > auxdev hanging off the PCI dev?
> >
> I don't see a need to re-init the whole PCI driver. Since only aux device config is
> changed only that piece to get reloaded.

But that is what mlx5 and other implementations does on reload no? i.e. a PCI driver reinit.
I can see an ice implementation of reload morphing to similar over time to support a new config
that requires a true reinit of PCI driver entities.

> 
> > Why not just allow the setting to apply dynamically during a 'set'
> > itself with an unplug/plug of the auxdev with correct type.
> >
> This suggestion came up in the internal discussion too.
> However such task needs to synchronize with devlink reload command and also
> with driver remove() sequence.
> So locking wise and depending on amount of config change, it is close to what
> reload will do.

Holding this mutex across the auxiliary device unplug/plug in "set" wont cut it?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc7/source/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c#L1304

> For example other resource config or other params setting also to take effect.
> So to avoid defining multiple config sequence, doing as part of already existing
> devlink reload, it brings simple sequence to user.
> 
> For example,
> 1. enable/disable desired aux devices
> 2. configure device resources
> 3. set some device params
> 4. do devlink reload and apply settings done in #1 to #3

Sure. But a user might also just want to operate on just an auxiliary device configuration change. As in #1.
And he ends up having everything hanging off the PF to get blown out, including potentially
the VFs. That feels like too big a hammer.

Shiraz