netdev - Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 08/12] UIO/Hyper-V: Not load UIO HV driver in the isolation VM.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHcOL+HlEoh5jPb8@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:45:51 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        wei.liu@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org,
        will@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com,
        sunilmut@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 08/12] UIO/Hyper-V: Not load UIO HV driver
 in the isolation VM.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:49:41AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> 
> UIO HV driver should not load in the isolation VM for security reason.
> Return ENOTSUPP in the hv_uio_probe() in the isolation VM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> index 0330ba99730e..678b021d66f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include <linux/hyperv.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
>  
>  #include "../hv/hyperv_vmbus.h"
>  
> @@ -241,6 +242,10 @@ hv_uio_probe(struct hv_device *dev,
>  	void *ring_buffer;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* UIO driver should not be loaded in the isolation VM.*/
> +	if (hv_is_isolation_supported())
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		
>  	/* Communicating with host has to be via shared memory not hypercall */
>  	if (!channel->offermsg.monitor_allocated) {
>  		dev_err(&dev->device, "vmbus channel requires hypercall\n");
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Again you send out known-wrong patches?

:(