netdev - RE: [net-next] enetc: fix locking for one-step timestamping packet transfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM7PR04MB6885805B7D5D11DD8DC1CA28F84E9@AM7PR04MB6885.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:18:57 +0000
From:   "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [net-next] enetc: fix locking for one-step timestamping packet
 transfer

Hi Jakub,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: 2021年4月14日 1:11
> To: Y.b. Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Richard
> Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>; Claudiu Manoil
> <claudiu.manoil@....com>; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>;
> Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Subject: Re: [net-next] enetc: fix locking for one-step timestamping packet
> transfer
> 
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:48:17 +0800 Yangbo Lu wrote:
> > +	/* Queue one-step Sync packet if already locked */
> > +	if (skb->cb[0] & ENETC_F_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC_TSTAMP) {
> > +		if
> (test_and_set_bit_lock(ENETC_TX_ONESTEP_TSTAMP_IN_PROGRESS,
> > +					  &priv->flags)) {
> > +			skb_queue_tail(&priv->tx_skbs, skb);
> > +			return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> 
> Isn't this missing queue_work() as well?
> 
> Also as I mentioned I don't understand why you created a separate workqueue
> instead of using the system workqueue via schedule_work().

queue_work(system_wq, ) was put in clean_tx. I finally followed the logic you suggested :)

See my reply in v2 discussion
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210408111350.3817-3-yangbo.lu@nxp.com/

And v3 patch merged (7294380c5211 enetc: support PTP Sync packet one-step timestamping)
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210412090327.22330-3-yangbo.lu@nxp.com/

Thanks.