[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210414080845.11426-1-lijunp213@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 03:08:45 -0500
From: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: core: make napi_disable more robust
There are chances that napi_disable can be called twice by NIC driver.
This could generate deadlock. For example,
the first napi_disable will spin until NAPI_STATE_SCHED is cleared
by napi_complete_done, then set it again.
When napi_disable is called the second time, it will loop infinitely
because no dev->poll will be running to clear NAPI_STATE_SCHED.
Though it is driver writer's responsibility to make sure it being
called only once, making napi_disable more robust does not hurt, not
to say it can prevent a buggy driver from crashing a system.
So, we check the napi state bit to make sure that if napi is already
disabled, we exit the call early enough to avoid spinning infinitely.
Fixes: bea3348eef27 ("[NET]: Make NAPI polling independent of struct net_device objects.")
Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
---
v2: justify that this patch makes napi_disable more robust.
net/core/dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 1f79b9aa9a3f..fa0aa212b7bb 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6830,6 +6830,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_add);
void napi_disable(struct napi_struct *n)
{
might_sleep();
+
+ /* make sure napi_disable() runs only once,
+ * When napi is disabled, the state bits are like:
+ * NAPI_STATE_SCHED (set by previous napi_disable)
+ * NAPI_STATE_NPSVC (set by previous napi_disable)
+ * NAPI_STATE_DISABLE (cleared by previous napi_disable)
+ * NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL (cleared by previous napi_complete_done)
+ * NAPI_STATE_MISSED (cleared by previous napi_complete_done)
+ */
+
+ if (napi_disable_pending(n))
+ return;
+ if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state) &&
+ test_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &n->state) &&
+ !test_bit(NAPI_STATE_MISSED, &n->state) &&
+ !test_bit(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, &n->state))
+ return;
+
set_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state);
while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists