[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e26fbcc8-ba3e-573a-523d-9c5d5f84bc46@tessares.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:25:03 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, tytso@....edu,
mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, davem@...emloft.net,
broonie@...nel.org, davidgow@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard
Hi Nico,
On 14/04/2021 10:58, Nico Pache wrote:
> Drop 'S' from end of CONFIG_MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS inorder to adhear to the
> KUNIT *_KUNIT_TEST config name format.
For MPTCP, we have multiple KUnit tests: crypto and token. That's why we
wrote TESTS with a S.
I'm fine without S if we need to stick with KUnit' standard. But maybe
the standard wants us to split the two tests and create
MPTCP_TOKEN_KUNIT_TEST and MPTCP_TOKEN_KUNIT_TEST config?
In this case, we could eventually keep MPTCP_KUNIT_TESTS which will in
charge of selecting the two new ones.
Up to the KUnit maintainers to decide ;-)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists