netdev - Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: run devmap xdp_prog on flush instead of bulk enqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210415001711.dpbt2lej75ry6v7a@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:17:11 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
CC:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: run devmap xdp_prog on flush instead
 of bulk enqueue

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:26:07PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
[ ... ]

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
> index aa516472ce46..3980fb3bfb09 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue {
>  	struct list_head flush_node;
>  	struct net_device *dev;
>  	struct net_device *dev_rx;
> +	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
>  	unsigned int count;
>  };
>  
> @@ -326,22 +327,71 @@ bool dev_map_can_have_prog(struct bpf_map *map)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static int dev_map_bpf_prog_run(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> +				struct xdp_frame **frames, int n,
> +				struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct xdp_txq_info txq = { .dev = dev };
> +	struct xdp_buff xdp;
> +	int i, nframes = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i];
> +		u32 act;
> +		int err;
> +
> +		xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
> +		xdp.txq = &txq;
> +
> +		act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
> +		switch (act) {
> +		case XDP_PASS:
> +			err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf);
> +			if (unlikely(err < 0))
> +				xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
> +			else
> +				frames[nframes++] = xdpf;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
> +			fallthrough;
> +		case XDP_ABORTED:
> +			trace_xdp_exception(dev, xdp_prog, act);
> +			fallthrough;
> +		case XDP_DROP:
> +			xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return nframes; /* sent frames count */
> +}
> +
>  static void bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *dev = bq->dev;
> -	int sent = 0, err = 0;
> +	int sent = 0, drops = 0, err = 0;
> +	unsigned int cnt = bq->count;
> +	int to_send = cnt;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!bq->count))
> +	if (unlikely(!cnt))
>  		return;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < bq->count; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
>  		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];
>  
>  		prefetch(xdpf);
>  	}
>  
> -	sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, bq->count, bq->q, flags);
> +	if (bq->xdp_prog) {
bq->xdp_prog is used here

> +		to_send = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev);
> +		if (!to_send)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		drops = cnt - to_send;
> +	}
> +

[ ... ]

>  static void bq_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
> -		       struct net_device *dev_rx)
> +		       struct net_device *dev_rx, struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
>  {
>  	struct list_head *flush_list = this_cpu_ptr(&dev_flush_list);
>  	struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq = this_cpu_ptr(dev->xdp_bulkq);
> @@ -412,18 +466,22 @@ static void bq_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
>  	/* Ingress dev_rx will be the same for all xdp_frame's in
>  	 * bulk_queue, because bq stored per-CPU and must be flushed
>  	 * from net_device drivers NAPI func end.
> +	 *
> +	 * Do the same with xdp_prog and flush_list since these fields
> +	 * are only ever modified together.
>  	 */
> -	if (!bq->dev_rx)
> +	if (!bq->dev_rx) {
>  		bq->dev_rx = dev_rx;
> +		bq->xdp_prog = xdp_prog;
bp->xdp_prog is assigned here and could be used later in bq_xmit_all().
How is bq->xdp_prog protected? Are they all under one rcu_read_lock()?
It is not very obvious after taking a quick look at xdp_do_flush[_map].

e.g. what if the devmap elem gets deleted.

[ ... ]

>  static inline int __xdp_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> -			       struct net_device *dev_rx)
> +				struct net_device *dev_rx,
> +				struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
>  {
>  	struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
>  	int err;
> @@ -439,42 +497,14 @@ static inline int __xdp_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>  	if (unlikely(!xdpf))
>  		return -EOVERFLOW;
>  
> -	bq_enqueue(dev, xdpf, dev_rx);
> +	bq_enqueue(dev, xdpf, dev_rx, xdp_prog);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
[ ... ]

> @@ -482,12 +512,7 @@ int dev_map_enqueue(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dst, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>  {
>  	struct net_device *dev = dst->dev;
>  
> -	if (dst->xdp_prog) {
> -		xdp = dev_map_run_prog(dev, xdp, dst->xdp_prog);
> -		if (!xdp)
> -			return 0;
> -	}
> -	return __xdp_enqueue(dev, xdp, dev_rx);
> +	return __xdp_enqueue(dev, xdp, dev_rx, dst->xdp_prog);
>  }