[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54839b05-78d2-8edf-317c-372f0ecda024@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:34:34 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>, mst@...hat.com,
lulu@...hat.com, leonro@...dia.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] vDPA/ifcvf: enable Intel C5000X-PL virtio-block for
vDPA
在 2021/4/14 下午5:18, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
> This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block
> for vDPA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
> #include <linux/vdpa.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h>
>
> @@ -28,7 +29,12 @@
> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086
> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001
>
> -#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4
> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001
> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086
> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002
> +
> +#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
> ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \
> @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF))
>
> +#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
> + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))
I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the reason
for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features() implemention?
E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED?
Thanks
> +
> /* Only one queue pair for now. */
> #define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev)
> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
> u64 features;
>
> - features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET)
> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
> +
> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK)
> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
>
> return features;
> }
> @@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = {
> C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID,
> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID,
> + C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID,
> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
>
> { 0 },
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists