[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a9a3b8b-f345-faae-b9bc-3961518e3d29@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:57:20 +0530
From: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: Add binding for TI TCAN104x CAN
transceivers
Hi Marc,
On 14/04/21 9:03 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 14.04.2021 19:35:18, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>> Add binding documentation for TI TCAN104x CAN transceivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4abfc30a97d0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml#"
>> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
>> +
>> +title: TCAN104x CAN TRANSCEIVER PHY
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + $nodename:
>> + pattern: "^tcan104x-phy"
>> +
>> + compatible:
>> + enum:
>> + - ti,tcan1042
>> + - ti,tcan1043
>
> Can you ensure that the 1042 has only the standby gpio and the 1043 has both?
>
In the driver, it is the way the flags have been set for ti,tcan1042 and
ti,tcan1043.
>> +
>> + '#phy-cells':
>> + const: 0
>> +
>> + standby-gpios:
>> + description:
>> + gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + enable-gpios:
>> + description:
>> + gpio node to toggle enable signal on transceiver
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + max-bitrate:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> + description:
>> + max bit rate supported in bps
>> + minimum: 1
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - '#phy-cells'
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +
>> + transceiver1: tcan104x-phy {
>> + compatible = "ti,tcan1043";
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + max-bitrate = <5000000>;
>> + standby-gpios = <&wakeup_gpio1 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + enable-gpios = <&main_gpio1 67 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
> AFAICS the enable gpio is active high.
>
I will correct this in the respin.
Thanks,
Aswath
> Marc
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists