netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 10/10] dt-bindings: net: korina: Add DT bindings for IDT 79RC3243x SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb85c151-cb22-9fff-13e1-3c26c8d76ab4@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Apr 2021 13:19:27 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 10/10] dt-bindings: net: korina: Add DT
 bindings for IDT 79RC3243x SoCs

On 16.04.2021 16:35, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:29:46PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 16.04.2021 11:52, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>>
>>> Add device tree bindings for ethernet controller integrated into
>>> IDT 79RC3243x SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
>>> ---
>>>    .../bindings/net/idt,3243x-emac.yaml          | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/idt,3243x-emac.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/idt,3243x-emac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/idt,3243x-emac.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..3697af5cb66f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/idt,3243x-emac.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/idt,3243x-emac.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: IDT 79rc3243x Ethernet controller
>>> +
>>> +description: Ethernet controller integrated into IDT 79RC3243x family SoCs
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: ethernet-controller.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: idt,3243x-emac
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 3
>>> +
>>> +  reg-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: korina_regs
>>> +      - const: korina_dma_rx
>>> +      - const: korina_dma_tx
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: RX interrupt
>>> +      - description: TX interrupt
>>> +
>>> +  interrupt-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: korina_rx
>>> +      - const: korina_tx
>>> +
>>> +  clocks:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clock-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: mdioclk
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - reg-names
>>> +  - interrupts
>>> +  - interrupt-names
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +
>>> +    ethernet@...00 {
>>> +        compatible = "idt,3243x-emac";
>>> +
>>> +        reg = <0x60000 0x10000>,
>>> +              <0x40000 0x14>,
>>> +              <0x40014 0x14>;
>>> +        reg-names = "korina_regs",
>>> +                    "korina_dma_rx",
>>> +                    "korina_dma_tx";
>>> +
>>> +        interrupts-extended = <&rcpic3 0>, <&rcpic3 1>;
>>
>>     You use this prop, yet don't describe it?
> 
> that's just interrupt-parent and interrupts in one statement. And since

    I know. :-) Yet you don't mention it, making the "interrupts" prop 
mandatory instead. And as both interrupt parents are the same here, it does 
not even seem justified...

> make dt_binding_check didn't complained I thought that's good this way.
> Rob, do I need to describe interrupts-extended as well ?
> 
> I could change that to interrupt-parent/interrupts as the driver no
> longer uses dma under/overrun interrupts, which have a different
> interrupt-parent.

    In DT, we describe the hardware,  not the driver's capabilities.

> Thomas.

MBR, Sergei