netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros accept a format specifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:36:18 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Marion et Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, tj@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros
 accept a format specifier

 

> Message du 19/04/21 01:03
> De : "Bart Van Assche" 
> A : "Christophe JAILLET" , tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, "Tejun Heo" 
> Copie à : netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
> Objet : Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Have 'alloc_workqueue()' like macros accept a format specifier
> 
> On 4/18/21 2:26 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Improve 'create_workqueue', 'create_freezable_workqueue' and
> > 'create_singlethread_workqueue' so that they accept a format
> > specifier and a variable number of arguments.
> > 
> > This will put these macros more in line with 'alloc_ordered_workqueue' and
> > the underlying 'alloc_workqueue()' function.
> > 
> > This will also allow further code simplification.
> 
> Please Cc Tejun for workqueue changes since he maintains the workqueue code.
>
 
Hi,

The list in To: is the one given by get_maintainer.pl. Usualy, I only put the ML in Cc:
I've run the script on the 2 patches of the serie and merged the 2 lists. Everyone is in the To: of the cover letter and of the 2 patches.

If Théo is "Tejun Heo" (  (maintainer:WORKQUEUE) ), he is already in the To: line.

CJ


> > diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> > index d15a7730ee18..145e756ff315 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> > @@ -425,13 +425,13 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
> > alloc_workqueue(fmt, WQ_UNBOUND | __WQ_ORDERED | \
> > __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT | (flags), 1, ##args)
> > 
> > -#define create_workqueue(name) \
> > - alloc_workqueue("%s", __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1, (name))
> > -#define create_freezable_workqueue(name) \
> > - alloc_workqueue("%s", __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_FREEZABLE | WQ_UNBOUND | \
> > - WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1, (name))
> > -#define create_singlethread_workqueue(name) \
> > - alloc_ordered_workqueue("%s", __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, name)
> > +#define create_workqueue(fmt, args...) \
> > + alloc_workqueue(fmt, __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1, ##args)
> > +#define create_freezable_workqueue(fmt, args...) \
> > + alloc_workqueue(fmt, __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_FREEZABLE | WQ_UNBOUND | \
> > + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1, ##args)
> > +#define create_singlethread_workqueue(fmt, args...) \
> > + alloc_ordered_workqueue(fmt, __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, ##args)
> > 
> > extern void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
> > 
> > 
> 
>