netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] net: sparx5: add ethtool configuration and statistics support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d5369c9e40e5eabcb8c2f8a133b50746c31f73bc.camel@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:54:15 +0000
From:   <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>
To:     <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <andrew@...n.ch>, <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        <Bjarni.Jonasson@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <Lars.Povlsen@...rochip.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mark.einon@...il.com>, <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] net: sparx5: add ethtool configuration and
 statistics support

Hi Jacub,

On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 14:26 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:16:56 +0200 Steen Hegelund wrote:
> > +     "rx_in_bytes",
> > +     "rx_symbol_err",
> > +     "rx_pause",
> > +     "rx_unsup_opcode",
> > +     "rx_ok_bytes",
> > +     "rx_bad_bytes",
> > +     "rx_unicast",
> > +     "rx_multicast",
> > +     "rx_broadcast",
> > +     "rx_crc_err",
> > +     "rx_undersize",
> > +     "rx_fragments",
> > +     "rx_inrangelen_err",
> > +     "rx_outofrangelen_err",
> > +     "rx_oversize",
> > +     "rx_jabbers",
> > +     "rx_size64",
> > +     "rx_size65_127",
> > +     "rx_size128_255",
> > +     "rx_size256_511",
> > +     "rx_size512_1023",
> > +     "rx_size1024_1518",
> > +     "rx_size1519_max",
> > +     "pmac_rx_symbol_err",
> > +     "pmac_rx_pause",
> > +     "pmac_rx_unsup_opcode",
> > +     "pmac_rx_ok_bytes",
> > +     "pmac_rx_bad_bytes",
> > +     "pmac_rx_unicast",
> > +     "pmac_rx_multicast",
> > +     "pmac_rx_broadcast",
> > +     "pmac_rx_crc_err",
> > +     "pmac_rx_undersize",
> > +     "pmac_rx_fragments",
> > +     "pmac_rx_inrangelen_err",
> > +     "pmac_rx_outofrangelen_err",
> > +     "pmac_rx_oversize",
> > +     "pmac_rx_jabbers",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size64",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size65_127",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size128_255",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size256_511",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size512_1023",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size1024_1518",
> > +     "pmac_rx_size1519_max",
> > +     "rx_local_drop",
> > +     "rx_port_policer_drop",
> > +     "tx_out_bytes",
> > +     "tx_pause",
> > +     "tx_ok_bytes",
> > +     "tx_unicast",
> > +     "tx_multicast",
> > +     "tx_broadcast",
> > +     "tx_size64",
> > +     "tx_size65_127",
> > +     "tx_size128_255",
> > +     "tx_size256_511",
> > +     "tx_size512_1023",
> > +     "tx_size1024_1518",
> > +     "tx_size1519_max",
> > +     "tx_multi_coll",
> > +     "tx_late_coll",
> > +     "tx_xcoll",
> > +     "tx_defer",
> > +     "tx_xdefer",
> > +     "tx_backoff1",
> > +     "pmac_tx_pause",
> > +     "pmac_tx_ok_bytes",
> > +     "pmac_tx_unicast",
> > +     "pmac_tx_multicast",
> > +     "pmac_tx_broadcast",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size64",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size65_127",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size128_255",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size256_511",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size512_1023",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size1024_1518",
> > +     "pmac_tx_size1519_max",
> 
> Please see
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=468795
> 
> (hopefully to be merged by the end of the week) and earlier patches for
> pause and FEC stats. Anything that has a standardized interface is off
> limits for the random ethtool -S grab bag.

OK.  I was not aware of that.

Thanks for your comments.

Best Regards
Steen