[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2850afee64efb6af2415cb3db75d4de14f3a1e2.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:22:47 +0000
From: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Siwik, Grzegorz" <grzegorz.siwik@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"Switzer, David" <david.switzer@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] igb: Add double-check MTA_REGISTER for i210
and i211
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 14:12 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:44:56 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > + bool is_failed;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + is_failed = false;
> > + for (i = hw->mac.mta_reg_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > + if (array_rd32(E1000_MTA, i) != hw-
> > >mac.mta_shadow[i]) {
> > + is_failed = true;
> > + array_wr32(E1000_MTA, i, hw-
> > >mac.mta_shadow[i]);
> > + wrfl();
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + } while (is_failed);
>
> Looks like a potential infinite loop on persistent failure.
> Also you don't need "is_failed", you can use while (i >= 0), or
> assign i = hw->mac.mta_reg_count, or consider using a goto.
We will make a follow on patch to address these issues.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists