[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YH8K0gkYoZVfq0FV@lore-desk>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:09:38 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, song@...nel.org,
toke@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next] cpumap: bulk skb using netif_receive_skb_list
[...]
> > + TP_ARGS(map_id, processed, sched, xdp_stats),
> >
> > TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > __field(int, map_id)
> > __field(u32, act)
> > __field(int, cpu)
> > - __field(unsigned int, drops)
> > __field(unsigned int, processed)
>
> So, struct member @processed will takeover the room for @drops.
>
> Can you please test how an old xdp_monitor program will react to this?
> Will it fail, or extract and show wrong values?
Ack, right. I think we should keep the struct layout in order to maintain
back-compatibility. I will fix it in v4.
>
> The xdp_mointor tool is in several external git repos:
>
> https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_kern.c
> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tutorial/tree/master/tracing02-xdp-monitor
>
> Do you have any plans for fixing those tools?
I update xdp_monitor_{kern,user}.c and xdp_redirect_cpu_{kern,user}.c in the
patch. Do you mean to post a dedicated patch for xdp-project tutorial?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists