[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbe896ed-860d-4a92-f92b-bce83ba413ee@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:08:22 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] xfrm: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:23, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> index 8831f5a9e992..41de46b5ffa9 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static int xfrmi4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
> case ICMP_DEST_UNREACH:
> if (icmp_hdr(skb)->code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED)
> return 0;
> + break;
> case ICMP_REDIRECT:
> break;
> default:
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists