netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Fix struct page layout on 32-bit systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3rzz1gfNLoGC8aZJiAC-tgZYD6P8pQsoEfgCAmQK=FAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:20:19 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "grygorii.strashko@...com" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mhocko@...nel.org" <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>,
        "mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com" <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Fix struct page layout on 32-bit systems

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:14 PM Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
> On 4/20/21 12:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> >
> > which means that half the 32-bit architectures do this. This may
> > cause more problems when arc and/or microblaze want to support
> > 64-bit kernels and compat mode in the future on their latest hardware,
> > as that means duplicating the x86 specific hacks we have for compat.
> >
> > What is alignof(u64) on 64-bit arc?
>
> $ echo 'int a = __alignof__(long long);' | arc64-linux-gnu-gcc -xc -
> -Wall -S -o - | grep -A1 a: | tail -n 1 | cut -f 3
> 8

Ok, good.

> Yeah ARCv2 alignment of 4 for 64-bit data was a bit of surprise finding
> for me as well. When 64-bit load/stores were initially targeted by the
> internal Metaware compiler (llvm based) they decided to keep alignment
> to 4 still (granted hardware allowed this) and then gcc guys decided to
> follow the same ABI. I only found this by accident :-)
>
> Can you point me to some specifics on the compat issue. For better of
> worse, arc64 does''t have a compat 32-bit mode, so everything is
> 64-on-64 or 32-on-32 (ARC32 flavor of ARCv3)

In that case, there should be no problem for you.

The main issue is with system calls and ioctls that contain a misaligned
struct member like

struct s {
       u32 a;
       u64 b;
};

Passing this structure by reference from a 32-bit user space application
to a 64-bit kernel with different alignment constraints means that the
kernel has to convert the structure layout. See
compat_ioctl_preallocate() in fs/ioctl.c for one such example.

       Arnd