[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6ce8bc9-7ccb-036a-7d78-3f6bf052a515@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:08:32 -0700
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5: mlx5_ifc updates for flex parser
On 4/20/2021 10:07 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>
> On 20-Apr-21 07:54, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> On 4/19/2021 8:20 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>>> From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> Added the required definitions for supporting more protocols by flex
>>> parsers
>>> (GTP-U, Geneve TLV options), and for using the right flex parser
>>> that was
>>> configured for this protocol.
>> Are you planning to support adding flow rules to match on these protocol
>> specific fields?
>> If so, are you planning to extend tc flower OR use other interfaces?
>
> Some of these are already supported through tc on DMFS.
> This patch series adds support for SMFS: Geneve options and MPLS
> both through tc and through rdma-core on root table,
> and GTP-U is supported only through rdma-core on root table.
What is the interface for rdma-core to hook into the driver to add these
rules?
Is there an equivalent of ndo_setup_tc() that is used with tc interface?
>
> -- YK
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> � include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> � 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists