netdev - Re: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: ethernet: mediatek: support custom GMAC label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:12:41 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Cc:     Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: ethernet: mediatek: support
 custom GMAC label

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:05 AM Frank Wunderlich
<frank-w@...lic-files.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for dsa slave-ports there is already a property "label", but not for master/cpu-ports

Is that because slave ports are external and master are not? If so,
that makes sense.

> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc8/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622-bananapi-bpi-r64.dts#L163
>
> handled here:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc8/source/net/dsa/dsa2.c#L1113
>
> @ilya maybe you can rename slave-ports instead of master-port without code change?
>
> i also prefer a more generic way to name interfaces in dts, not only in the mtk-driver, but the udev-approach is a way too, but this needs to be configured on each system manually...a preset by kernel/dts will be nice (at least to distinguish master/cpu- and user-ports).


Seems like it could be possible to want to distinguish port types for
reasons other than just what to name the device. Better to describe
that difference in DT and then base the device name off of that.

If you just want fixed numbering, then 'aliases' node is generally how
that is done (either because it sneaks in or fatigue from arguing
fixed /dev nodes are an anti-feature). There's already 'ethernetN'
which u-boot uses, but the kernel so far does not.

Rob