[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIFq2NIhdMWTDshX@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] mtk_eth_soc: fixes and performance
improvements
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:09:00PM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> Most of these changes come from OpenWrt where they have been present and
> tested for months.
>
> First three patches are bug fixes. The rest are performance
> improvements. The last patch is a cleanup to use the iopoll.h macro for
> busy-waiting instead of a custom loop.
Do you have any benchmark numbers you can share?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists