[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIGikZ2xZhH7ZRZc@shredder.lan>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:21:37 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...dia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netdevsim: Only use sampling truncation length
when valid
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:50:50 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> >
> > When the sampling truncation length is invalid (zero), pass the length
> > of the packet. Without the fix, no payload is reported to user space
> > when the truncation length is zero.
> >
> > Fixes: a8700c3dd0a4 ("netdevsim: Add dummy psample implementation")
> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Thanks!
>
> > + md->trunc_size = psample->trunc_size ? psample->trunc_size : len;
>
> nit: ... = psample->trunc_size ? : len; ?
Yea, I don't find this form too readable and always prefer the one I
used when it fits in a single line :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists