[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ad73fdc-e81a-9b4b-1dce-e8c304e88e0a@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:35:03 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/17] libbpf: extend sanity checking ELF
symbols with externs validation
On 4/16/21 1:23 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Add logic to validate extern symbols, plus some other minor extra checks, like
> ELF symbol #0 validation, general symbol visibility and binding validations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> index 1263641e8b97..283249df9831 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> @@ -750,14 +750,39 @@ static int linker_sanity_check_elf_symtab(struct src_obj *obj, struct src_sec *s
> n = sec->shdr->sh_size / sec->shdr->sh_entsize;
> sym = sec->data->d_buf;
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++, sym++) {
> - if (sym->st_shndx
> - && sym->st_shndx < SHN_LORESERVE
> - && sym->st_shndx >= obj->sec_cnt) {
> + int sym_type = ELF64_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info);
> + int sym_bind = ELF64_ST_BIND(sym->st_info);
> +
> + if (i == 0) {
> + if (sym->st_name != 0 || sym->st_info != 0
> + || sym->st_other != 0 || sym->st_shndx != 0
> + || sym->st_value != 0 || sym->st_size != 0) {
> + pr_warn("ELF sym #0 is invalid in %s\n", obj->filename);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + continue;
> + }
In ELF file, the first entry of symbol table and section table (index 0)
is invalid/undefined.
Symbol table '.symtab' contains 9 entries:
Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name
0: 0000000000000000 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Address Off Size
ES Flg Lk Inf Al
[ 0] NULL 0000000000000000 000000 000000
00 0 0 0
Instead of validating them, I think we can skip traversal of the index =
0 entry for symbol table and section header table. What do you think?
> + if (sym_bind != STB_LOCAL && sym_bind != STB_GLOBAL && sym_bind != STB_WEAK) {
> + pr_warn("ELF sym #%d is section #%zu has unsupported symbol binding %d\n",
> + i, sec->sec_idx, sym_bind);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (sym->st_shndx == 0) {
> + if (sym_type != STT_NOTYPE || sym_bind == STB_LOCAL
> + || sym->st_value != 0 || sym->st_size != 0) {
> + pr_warn("ELF sym #%d is invalid extern symbol in %s\n",
> + i, obj->filename);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (sym->st_shndx < SHN_LORESERVE && sym->st_shndx >= obj->sec_cnt) {
> pr_warn("ELF sym #%d in section #%zu points to missing section #%zu in %s\n",
> i, sec->sec_idx, (size_t)sym->st_shndx, obj->filename);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - if (ELF64_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info) == STT_SECTION) {
> + if (sym_type == STT_SECTION) {
> if (sym->st_value != 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> continue;
> @@ -1135,16 +1160,16 @@ static int linker_append_elf_syms(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *obj
> size_t dst_sym_idx;
> int name_off;
>
> - /* we already have all-zero initial symbol */
> - if (sym->st_name == 0 && sym->st_info == 0 &&
> - sym->st_other == 0 && sym->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF &&
> - sym->st_value == 0 && sym->st_size ==0)
> + /* We already validated all-zero symbol #0 and we already
> + * appended it preventively to the final SYMTAB, so skip it.
> + */
> + if (i == 0)
> continue;
>
> sym_name = elf_strptr(obj->elf, str_sec_idx, sym->st_name);
> if (!sym_name) {
> pr_warn("can't fetch symbol name for symbol #%d in '%s'\n", i, obj->filename);
> - return -1;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (sym->st_shndx && sym->st_shndx < SHN_LORESERVE) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists