netdev - Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:27:17 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:10:53AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:21 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:07:11AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:44 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:10:08PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:15:23AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > > If you look at the code, this is impossible to have happen.
> > > > > > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > > They introduce kernel bugs on purpose. Yesterday, I took a look on 4
> > > > > accepted patches from Aditya and 3 of them added various severity security
> > > > > "holes".
> > > >
> > > > All contributions by this group of people need to be reverted, if they
> > > > have not been done so already, as what they are doing is intentional
> > > > malicious behavior and is not acceptable and totally unethical.  I'll
> > > > look at it after lunch unless someone else wants to do it...
> > >
> > > A lot of these have already reached the stable trees. I can send you
> > > revert patches for stable by the end of today (if your scripts have
> > > not already done it).
> >
> > Yes, if you have a list of these that are already in the stable trees,
> > that would be great to have revert patches, it would save me the extra
> > effort these mess is causing us to have to do...
> 
> The patch series for all the stable branches should be with you now.
> 
> But for others:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YIEVGXEoeizx6O1p@debian/  for v5.11.y
> and other branches are sent as a reply to that mail.

Thank you, I now have them.  I will be looking at them when I get the
chance, and comparing them to what I end up getting merged into
5.13-rc1.

greg k-h