lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIMgMHwYkVBdrICs@unreal>
Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:29:52 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:     "Shelat, Abhi" <a.shelat@...theastern.edu>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 02:07:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 08:25:28PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:39:50PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:56:37AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:49:31PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > If you want to see another accepted patch that is already part of
> > > > > stable@, you are invited to take a look on this patch that has "built-in bug":
> > > > > 8e949363f017 ("net: mlx5: Add a missing check on idr_find, free buf")
> > > > 
> > > > Interesting, thanks.
> > > 
> > > Though looking at it now, I'm not actually seeing the bug--probably I'm
> > > overlooking something obvious.
> > 
> > It was fixed in commit 31634bf5dcc4 ("net/mlx5: FPGA, tls, hold rcu read lock a bit longer")
> 
> So is the "Fixes:" line on that commit wrong?  It claims the bug was
> introduced by an earlier commit, ab412e1dd7db ("net/mlx5: Accel, add TLS
> rx offload routines").

Yes, I think that Fixes line is misleading.

> 
> Looks like Aditya Pakki's commit may have widened the race a little, but
> I find it a little hard to fault him for that.

We can argue about severity of this bug, but the whole paper talks about
introduction of UAF bugs unnoticed.

Thanks

> 
> --b.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ