[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e46d7ad-55dd-7caf-0a39-344b80bdceb3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:26:24 -0700
From: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Lijun Pan <lijunp213@...il.com>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.ibm.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tom Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net] ibmvnic: Continue with reset if set link down
failed
On 4/22/21 10:21 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Merging do_reset and do_hard_reset might be a good code cleanup which is
> out of the scope of this fix.
I agree, on both points. Accepting the patch, and improving the reset
path are not in conflict with each other.
My position is that improving the reset path is certainly on the table,
but not with this bug or this fix. Within the context of this discovered
problem, the issue is well understood, the fix is small and addresses the
immediate problem, and it has not generated new bugs under subsequent
testing. For those reasons, the submitted patch has my support.
Rick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists