[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210426134711.GE21222@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:47:11 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"Shelat, Abhi" <a.shelat@...theastern.edu>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@...hat.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:36:05AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 08:29:53AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 08:41:27PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 05:34:54PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > In Greg's revert thread, Kangjie Lu's messages are also missing from the
> > > > archives:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm going to guess it's one of two things. The first is that they are
> > > sending mail messages with HTML which is getting bounced; the other
> > > possibility is that some of the messages were sent only to Greg, and
> > > he added the mailing list back to the cc.
> > >
> > > So for exampple, message-id
> > > CA+EnHHSw4X+ubOUNYP2zXNpu70G74NN1Sct2Zin6pRgq--TqhA@...l.gmail.com
> > > isn't in lore, but Greg's reply:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH%2FfM%2FTsbmcZzwnX@kroah.com/
> > >
> > > can be found in lore.kernel.org was presumably because the message
> > > where Aditya accused "wild accusations bordering on slander" and his
> > > claim that his patches were the fault of a "new static code analyzer"
> > > was sent only to Greg? Either that, or it was bounced because he sent
> > > it from gmail without suppressing HTML.
> >
> > I did not "add back" the mailing list, it looks like they sent email in
> > html format which prevented it from hitting the public lists. I have
> > the originals sent to me that shows the author intended it to be public.
>
> Yes, the list cc's are all on there.
>
> It's multipart/alternative with equivalent plain text and html parts,
> which appears to be gmail's default behavior. Is that really rejected
> by default?
Hah, when I sent that mail I quoted parts of the message including the
Content-Type headers delineating the parts and got an immediate bounce
saying "The message contains HTML subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM
or Outlook Virus. TEXT/PLAIN is accepted".
Which seems perfectly clear. OK, sorry for the noise!
--b.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists