[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFv23Qnf3aJQyXyDbb_nvq2XU8t9Gy5sLFyzM251-FU_qBBUjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:36:24 +0800
From: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> 於 2021年4月25日 週日 上午4:07寫道:
>
> On 23.04.2021 05:42, AceLan Kao wrote:
> > Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> 於 2021年4月22日 週四 下午3:09寫道:
> >>
> >> On 22.04.2021 08:30, AceLan Kao wrote:
> >>> Yes, should add
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach")
> >>> and also
> >>> Fixes: 9513d2a5dc7f ("igc: Add legacy power management support")
> >>>
> >> Please don't top-post. Apart from that:
> >> If the issue was introduced with driver changes, then adding a workaround
> >> in net core may not be the right approach.
> > It's hard to say who introduces this issue, we probably could point
> > our finger to below commit
> > bd869245a3dc net: core: try to runtime-resume detached device in __dev_open
> >
> > This calling path is not usual, in my case, the NIC is not plugged in
> > any Ethernet cable,
> > and we are doing networking tests on another NIC on the system. So,
> > remove the rtnl lock from igb driver will affect other scenarios.
> >
> >>
> >>> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> 於 2021年4月21日 週三 上午3:27寫道:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:34:17 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:54 AM AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The rtnl_lock() has been called in rtnetlink_rcv_msg(), and then in
> >>>>>> __dev_open() it calls pm_runtime_resume() to resume devices, and in
> >>>>>> some devices' resume function(igb_resum,igc_resume) they calls rtnl_lock()
> >>>>>> again. That leads to a recursive lock.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It should leave the devices' resume function to decide if they need to
> >>>>>> call rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock(), so call rtnl_unlock() before calling
> >>>>>> pm_runtime_resume() and then call rtnl_lock() after it in __dev_open().
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Acelan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When was the bugg added ?
> >>>>> Please add a Fixes: tag
> >>>>
> >>>> For immediate cause probably:
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach")
> >>>>
> >>>>> By doing so, you give more chances for reviewers to understand why the
> >>>>> fix is not risky,
> >>>>> and help stable teams work.
> >>>>
> >>>> IMO the driver lacks internal locking. Taking 看rtnl from resume is just
> >>>> one example, git history shows many more places that lacked locking and
> >>>> got papered over with rtnl here.
> >>
>
> You could alternatively try the following. It should avoid the deadlock,
> and when runtime-resuming if __IGB_DOWN is set all we do is marking the
> net_device as present (because of PCI D3 -> D0 transition).
> I do basically the same in r8169 and it works as intended.
>
> Disclaimer: I don't have an igb-driven device and therefore can't test
> the proposal.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index 038a9fd1a..21436626a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -9300,6 +9300,14 @@ static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> + if (test_bit(__IGB_DOWN, &adapter->state)) {
> + netif_device_attach(netdev);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> return igb_resume(dev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Hi Heiner,
I encountered below error after applied your patch.
[ 121.489970] u kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 121.489979] u kernel: igb 0000:05:00.0: disabling already-disabled device
[ 121.490008] u kernel: WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 258 at
drivers/pci/pci.c:2146 pci_disable_device+0x91/0xb0
[ 121.490028] u kernel: Modules linked in: rfcomm cmac algif_hash
algif_skcipher af_alg bnep btusb btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth
ecdh_generic ecc joydev input_leds inte
l_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp
coretemp ath10k_pci ath10k_core kvm_intel ath mac80211 kvm
snd_sof_pci_intel_tgl snd_soc_acpi_intel_ma
tch snd_sof_intel_hda_common nls_iso8859_1 soundwire_intel
soundwire_generic_allocation soundwire_cadence soundwire_bus
snd_sof_pci snd_soc_acpi snd_sof snd_soc_core snd
_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi
crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_sof_xtensa_dsp ghash_clmulni_intel
ledtrig_audio aesni_intel snd_hda_intel
libarc4 crypto_simd snd_intel_dspcfg snd_intel_sdw_acpi cryptd
snd_hda_codec cfg80211 mei_hdcp snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
intel_wmi_thunderbolt snd_pcm wmi_bmof snd_seq inte
l_cstate efi_pstore snd_timer snd_seq_device ee1004 mei_me snd mei
ucsi_acpi soundcore typec_ucsi typec wmi mac_hid acpi_pad acpi_tad
sch_fq_codel
[ 121.490314] u kernel: parport_pc ppdev lp parport ip_tables
x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic zstd_compress raid10 raid456
async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_
pq async_xor async_tx libcrc32c xor raid6_pq raid1 raid0 multipath
linear hid_generic usbhid hid i915 drm_kms_helper syscopyarea
sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec rc
_core igb drm nvme e1000e nvme_core i2c_i801 dca i2c_smbus
i2c_algo_bit intel_lpss_pci intel_lpss ahci idma64 video xhci_pci
libahci virt_dma xhci_pci_renesas pinctrl_ti
gerlake
[ 121.490508] u kernel: CPU: 7 PID: 258 Comm: kworker/7:2 Tainted: G
U 5.12.0-rc7+ #79
[ 121.490518] u kernel: Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7090/, BIOS
0.12.80 02/23/2021
[ 121.490525] u kernel: Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
[ 121.490540] u kernel: RIP: 0010:pci_disable_device+0x91/0xb0
[ 121.490550] u kernel: Code: 4d 85 e4 75 07 4c 8b a3 c8 00 00 00 48
8d bb c8 00 00 00 e8 61 8d 17 00 4c 89 e2 48 c7 c7 60 5a e0 a5 48 89
c6 e8 9b a3 59 00 <0f> 0b eb 8
d 48 89 df e8 e3 fe ff ff 80 a3 49 0a 00 00 df 5b 41 5c
[ 121.490558] u kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb76b4169fc90 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 121.490569] u kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e2581ee6000
RCX: 0000000000000027
[ 121.490576] u kernel: RDX: 0000000000000027 RSI: ffffffffa493bca0
RDI: ffff9e27073e89b8
[ 121.490582] u kernel: RBP: ffffb76b4169fca0 R08: ffff9e27073e89b0
R09: 0000000000000000
[ 121.490588] u kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001
R12: ffff9e2581af7c80
[ 121.490594] u kernel: R13: ffff9e2581ee6000 R14: ffff9e25a0914000
R15: ffff9e25a0915280
[ 121.490600] u kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
GS:ffff9e2707200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 121.490608] u kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 121.490614] u kernel: CR2: 00007ff86ec8d024 CR3: 0000000189c28002
CR4: 0000000000770ee0
[ 121.490621] u kernel: PKRU: 55555554
[ 121.490626] u kernel: Call Trace:
[ 121.490638] u kernel: __igb_shutdown+0xf2/0x1c0 [igb]
[ 121.490676] u kernel: igb_runtime_suspend+0x1c/0x20 [igb]
[ 121.490703] u kernel: pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x63/0x180
[ 121.490715] u kernel: ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x90/0x90
[ 121.490727] u kernel: __rpm_callback+0xc7/0x140
[ 121.490740] u kernel: rpm_callback+0x57/0x80
[ 121.490750] u kernel: ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x90/0x90
[ 121.490759] u kernel: rpm_suspend+0x119/0x640
[ 121.490774] u kernel: pm_runtime_work+0x64/0xc0
[ 121.490784] u kernel: process_one_work+0x2af/0x5d0
[ 121.490803] u kernel: worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
[ 121.490814] u kernel: ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0
[ 121.490825] u kernel: kthread+0x12a/0x160
[ 121.490834] u kernel: ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
[ 121.490844] u kernel: ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 121.490867] u kernel: irq event stamp: 0[ 121.490871] u kernel:
hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 121.490916] u kernel: hardirqs last disabled at (0):
[<ffffffffa489ea44>] copy_process+0x714/0x1cc0
[ 121.490929] u kernel: softirqs last enabled at (0):
[<ffffffffa489ea44>] copy_process+0x714/0x1cc0
[ 121.490938] u kernel: softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 121.490949] u kernel: ---[ end trace a9c7ffc27c226979 ]---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists