[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIhXxmXdjQdrrPbT@lore-desk>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:28:22 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, shayagr@...zon.com,
sameehj@...zon.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Tirthendu <tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer
support
[...]
> Took your patches for a test run with the AF_XDP sample xdpsock on an
> i40e card and the throughput degradation is between 2 to 6% depending
> on the setup and microbenchmark within xdpsock that is executed. And
> this is without sending any multi frame packets. Just single frame
> ones. Tirtha made changes to the i40e driver to support this new
> interface so that is being included in the measurements.
>
> What performance do you see with the mvneta card? How much are we
> willing to pay for this feature when it is not being used or can we in
> some way selectively turn it on only when needed?
Hi Magnus,
Today I carried out some comparison tests between bpf-next and bpf-next +
xdp_multibuff series on mvneta running xdp_rxq_info sample. Results are
basically aligned:
bpf-next:
- xdp drop ~ 665Kpps
- xdp_tx ~ 291Kpps
- xdp_pass ~ 118Kpps
bpf-next + xdp_multibuff:
- xdp drop ~ 672Kpps
- xdp_tx ~ 288Kpps
- xdp_pass ~ 118Kpps
I am not sure if results are affected by the low power CPU, I will run some
tests on ixgbe card.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks: Magnus
>
> > Eelco Chaudron (4):
> > bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
> > bpd: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers
> > bpf: add new frame_length field to the XDP ctx
> > bpf: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include multi-buffer
> >
> > Lorenzo Bianconi (10):
> > xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
> > xdp: add xdp_shared_info data structure
> > net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
> > xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
> > net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
> > net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP
> > net: xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_build_skb_from_fram
> > bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init
> > bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()
> > bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish
> > signature
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 182 ++++++++++--------
> > include/linux/filter.h | 7 +
> > include/net/xdp.h | 105 +++++++++-
> > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> > net/bpf/test_run.c | 109 +++++++++--
> > net/core/filter.c | 134 ++++++++++++-
> > net/core/xdp.c | 103 +++++++++-
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> > .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 105 ++++++++++
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c | 127 ++++++++----
> > .../bpf/progs/test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow.c | 17 +-
> > .../bpf/progs/test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink.c | 32 ++-
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c | 3 +-
> > 13 files changed, 767 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists