[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YIxaf3hu2mRUbBGn@pevik>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:29:03 +0200
From: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@...il.com>
To: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2] lib/fs: fix issue when
{name,open}_to_handle_at() is not implemented
Hi,
> > +++ b/lib/fs.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,27 @@
> > /* if not already mounted cgroup2 is mounted here for iproute2's use */
> > #define MNT_CGRP2_PATH "/var/run/cgroup2"
> > +
> > +#ifndef defined HAVE_HANDLE_AT
> This is also wrong, it must be:
> #ifndef HAVE_HANDLE_AT
> > +struct file_handle {
> > + unsigned handle_bytes;
> > + int handle_type;
> > + unsigned char f_handle[];
> > +};
> > +
> > +int name_to_handle_at(int dirfd, const char *pathname,
> > + struct file_handle *handle, int *mount_id, int flags)
> > +{
> > + return syscall(name_to_handle_at, 5, dirfd, pathname, handle,
> > + mount_id, flags);
> Also I overlooked bogus 5 parameter, why is here? Correct is:
> return syscall(__NR_name_to_handle_at, dfd, pathname, handle,
> mount_id, flags);
Uh, one more typo on my side, sorry (dfd => dirfd):
return syscall(__NR_name_to_handle_at, dirfd, pathname, handle,
mount_id, flags);
Kind regards,
Petr
> > +}
> > +
> > +int open_by_handle_at(int mount_fd, struct file_handle *handle, int flags)
> > +{
> > + return syscall(open_by_handle_at, 3, mount_fd, handle, flags);
> And here 3, correct version is is:
> return syscall(__NR_open_by_handle_at, mount_fd, handle, flags);
> + adding at the top:
> #ifndef HAVE_HANDLE_AT
> # include <sys/syscall.h>
> #endif
> Kind regards,
> Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists