netdev - Re: [PATCH net] dsa: mv88e6xxx: 6161: Use chip wide MAX MTU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YI/prD8CRv5zQ8dz@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 3 May 2021 14:16:44 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        曹煜 <cao88yu@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dsa: mv88e6xxx: 6161: Use chip wide MAX MTU

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 02:38:14AM +0000, Chris Packham wrote:
> 
> On 1/05/21 2:01 am, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 01:34:41AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> The datasheets suggests the 6161 uses a per port setting for jumbo
> >> frames. Testing has however shown this is not correct, it uses the old
> >> style chip wide MTU control. Change the ops in the 6161 structure to
> >> reflect this.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1baf0fac10fb ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use chip-wide max frame size for MTU")
> >> Reported by: 曹煜 <cao88yu@...il.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > self NACK.
> >
> > We dug deeper and found a different real problem. Patches to follow.
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I'm back on-line now. Anything I can help look at?

Hi Chris

I have patches to post soon. I will include you in Cc:.

  Andrew