[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <685c25c2423c451480c0ad2cf78877be@garmin.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:37:45 +0000
From: "Huang, Joseph" <Joseph.Huang@...min.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/6] bridge: Fix snooping in multi-bridge config with
switchdev
> Hi,
> This patch-set is inappropriate for -net, if at all. It's quite late over here and I'll
> review the rest later, but I can say from a quick peek that patch 02 is
> unacceptable for it increases the complexity with 1 order of magnitude of all
> add/del call paths and some of them can be invoked on user packets. A lot of
> this functionality should be "hidden" in the driver or done by a user-space
> daemon/helper.
> Most of the flooding behaviour changes must be hidden behind some new
> option otherwise they'll break user setups that rely on the current. I'll review
> the patches in detail over the following few days, net-next is closed anyway.
>
> Cheers,
> Nik
Hi Nik,
Thanks for your quick response!
Once you have a chance to review the set, please let me know how I can improve them to make them acceptable. These are real problems and we do need to fix them.
Thanks,
Joseph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists