[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJbOWw3q6rYG/wcV@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 19:46:03 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 08/28] net: dsa: qca8k: handle error with
qca8k_read operation
> static int
> qca8k_fdb_next(struct qca8k_priv *priv, struct qca8k_fdb *fdb, int port)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret, ret_read;
>
> qca8k_fdb_write(priv, fdb->vid, fdb->port_mask, fdb->mac, fdb->aging);
> ret = qca8k_fdb_access(priv, QCA8K_FDB_NEXT, port);
> - if (ret >= 0)
> - qca8k_fdb_read(priv, fdb);
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + ret_read = qca8k_fdb_read(priv, fdb);
> + if (ret_read < 0)
> + return ret_read;
> + }
This is O.K, but it is a bit of an odd structure. How about
qca8k_fdb_write(priv, fdb->vid, fdb->port_mask, fdb->mac, fdb->aging);
ret = qca8k_fdb_access(priv, QCA8K_FDB_NEXT, port);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return qca8k_fdb_read(priv, fdb);
}
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists