netdev - [Patch bpf-next v4 07/12] af_unix: implement unix_dgram_bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210508220835.53801-8-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat,  8 May 2021 15:08:30 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, jiang.wang@...edance.com,
        duanxiongchun@...edance.com, wangdongdong.6@...edance.com,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: [Patch bpf-next v4 07/12] af_unix: implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg()

From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>

We have to implement unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg() to replace the
original ->recvmsg() to retrieve skmsg from ingress_msg.

AF_UNIX is again special here because the lack of
sk_prot->recvmsg(). I simply add a special case inside
unix_dgram_recvmsg() to call sk->sk_prot->recvmsg() directly.

Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
---
 include/net/af_unix.h |  3 +++
 net/unix/af_unix.c    | 19 ++++++++++++++---
 net/unix/unix_bpf.c   | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index cca645846af1..49b13e9bffd0 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ static inline struct unix_sock *unix_sk(const struct sock *sk)
 long unix_inq_len(struct sock *sk);
 long unix_outq_len(struct sock *sk);
 
+int __unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
+			 int nonblock, int flags);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
 int unix_sysctl_register(struct net *net);
 void unix_sysctl_unregister(struct net *net);
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 5424e8007858..e718ca6237a7 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2100,11 +2100,11 @@ static void unix_copy_addr(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk)
 	}
 }
 
-static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
-			      size_t size, int flags)
+int __unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
+			 int nonblock, int flags)
 {
 	struct scm_cookie scm;
-	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+	struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
 	struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
 	struct sk_buff *skb, *last;
 	long timeo;
@@ -2207,6 +2207,19 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
+			      int flags)
+{
+	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+	if (sk->sk_prot != &unix_proto)
+		return sk->sk_prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, size, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
+					    flags & ~MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL);
+#endif
+	return __unix_dgram_recvmsg(sk, msg, size, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, flags);
+}
+
 static int unix_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
 			  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
 {
diff --git a/net/unix/unix_bpf.c b/net/unix/unix_bpf.c
index 3ff71fb9aac8..debe82e1035d 100644
--- a/net/unix/unix_bpf.c
+++ b/net/unix/unix_bpf.c
@@ -6,6 +6,52 @@
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/af_unix.h>
 
+static int unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
+				  size_t len, int nonblock, int flags,
+				  int *addr_len)
+{
+	struct sk_psock *psock;
+	int copied, ret;
+
+	psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
+	if (unlikely(!psock))
+		return __unix_dgram_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, nonblock, flags);
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+	if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) &&
+	    sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) {
+		ret = __unix_dgram_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, nonblock, flags);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+msg_bytes_ready:
+	copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
+	if (!copied) {
+		int data, err = 0;
+		long timeo;
+
+		timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, nonblock);
+		data = sk_msg_wait_data(sk, psock, flags, timeo, &err);
+		if (data) {
+			if (!sk_psock_queue_empty(psock))
+				goto msg_bytes_ready;
+			ret = __unix_dgram_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, nonblock,
+						   flags);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		if (err) {
+			ret = err;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		copied = -EAGAIN;
+	}
+	ret = copied;
+out:
+	release_sock(sk);
+	sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static struct proto *unix_prot_saved __read_mostly;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(unix_prot_lock);
 static struct proto unix_bpf_prot;
@@ -15,6 +61,7 @@ static void unix_bpf_rebuild_protos(struct proto *prot, const struct proto *base
 	*prot        = *base;
 	prot->unhash = sock_map_unhash;
 	prot->close  = sock_map_close;
+	prot->recvmsg = unix_dgram_bpf_recvmsg;
 }
 
 static void unix_bpf_check_needs_rebuild(struct proto *ops)
-- 
2.25.1