netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 28/28] net: phy: add qca8k driver for qca8k switch internal PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d778eae8-07da-dafd-3dac-29ea68ac4b17@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 May 2021 08:45:13 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 28/28] net: phy: add qca8k driver for
 qca8k switch internal PHY



On 5/8/2021 4:30 AM, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:35:35PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:29:18AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>>> Add initial support for qca8k internal PHYs. The internal PHYs requires
>>> special mmd and debug values to be set based on the switch revision
>>> passwd using the dev_flags. Supports output of idle, receive and eee_wake
>>> errors stats.
>>> Some debug values sets can't be translated as the documentation lacks any
>>> reference about them.
>>
>> I think this can be merged into at803x.c, as they have almost the same
>> registers, and some features such as interrupt handler and cable test
>> can be reused.
>>
> 
> Wouldn't this be a little bit confusing? But actually yes... interrupt
> handler and cable test have the same regs. My main concern is about the
> phy_dev flags and the dbg regs that I think are different and would
> create some confusion. If this It's not a proble, sure I can rework this
> a put in the at803x.c phy driver.

Consistency is key, and having all of your PHY eggs in the same PHY
driver basket is easier for maintenance and generalizing features.
drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c contains PHY entries for integrated PHY
switches, too (5395, 53125). As far as phydev::dev_flags, you can skip
interpreting those unless you match the QCA8K PHY driver entry/probe.
-- 
Florian