[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJk8LMFViV7Z3Uu7@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:59:08 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
mjpeg-users@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/53] Get rid of UTF-8 chars that can be mapped as ASCII
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:16:16PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 10/05/2021 12:55, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The main point on this series is to replace just the occurrences
> > where ASCII represents the symbol equally well
>
> > - U+2014 ('—'): EM DASH
> Em dash is not the same thing as hyphen-minus, and the latter does not
> serve 'equally well'. People use em dashes because — even in
> monospace fonts — they make text easier to read and comprehend, when
> used correctly.
> I accept that some of the other distinctions — like en dashes — are
> needlessly pedantic (though I don't doubt there is someone out there
> who will gladly defend them with the same fervour with which I argue
> for the em dash) and I wouldn't take the trouble to use them myself;
> but I think there is a reasonable assumption that when someone goes
> to the effort of using a Unicode punctuation mark that is semantic
> (rather than merely typographical), they probably had a reason for
> doing so.
I think you're overestimating the amount of care and typographical
knowledge that your average kernel developer has. Most of these
UTF-8 characters come from latex conversions and really aren't
necessary (and are being used incorrectly).
You seem quite knowedgeable about the various differences. Perhaps
you'd be willing to write a document for Documentation/doc-guide/
that provides guidance for when to use which kinds of horizontal
line? https://www.punctuationmatters.com/hyphen-dash-n-dash-and-m-dash/
talks about it in the context of publications, but I think we need
something more suited to our needs for kernel documentation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists