[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210510105728.2eac4666@carbon>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 10:57:28 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
Cc: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
brouer@...hat.com, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH intel-net 0/5] i40e: ice: ixgbe: ixgbevf: igb: add
correct exception tracing for XDP
On Mon, 10 May 2021 08:06:00 +0200
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 12:58 AM Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 12:04 +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> > > Add missing exception tracing to XDP when a number of different errors
> > > can occur. The support was only partial. Several errors where not
> > > logged which would confuse the user quite a lot not knowing where and
> > > why the packets disappeared.
> > >
> > > This patch set fixes this for all Intel drivers with XDP support.
> > >
> > > Thanks: Magnus
> >
> > This doesn't apply anymore with the 5.13 patches. It looks like your
> > "optimize for XDP_REDIRECT in xsk path" patches are conflicting with
> > some of these. Did you want to rework them?
>
> I will rebase them and resubmit.
Thanks for working on this Magnus, highly appreciated. This should
help end-users troubleshoot these kind of 'exception' packet drops.
We have people that will look at updating the sample/bpf/ programs
(that does XDP redirect) to report on these exception errors/drops.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists