netdev - Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: Check for hotplug-status existence before watching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJpgNvOmDL9SuRye@mail-itl>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 12:45:10 +0200
From:   Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 
        <marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>
To:     "Durrant, Paul" <pdurrant@...zon.co.uk>
Cc:     Michael Brown <mbrown@...systems.co.uk>,
        "paul@....org" <paul@....org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: Check for hotplug-status existence before
 watching

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:40:54PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 07:06:55AM +0000, Durrant, Paul wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>
> > > Sent: 10 May 2021 20:43
> > > To: Michael Brown <mbrown@...systems.co.uk>; paul@....org
> > > Cc: paul@....org; xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; wei.liu@...nel.org; Durrant,
> > > Paul <pdurrant@...zon.co.uk>
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] xen-netback: Check for hotplug-status existence before watching
> > > 
> > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Michael Brown wrote:
> > > > If you have a suggested patch, I'm happy to test that it doesn't reintroduce
> > > > the regression bug that was fixed by this commit.
> > > 
> > > Actually, I've just tested with a simple reloading xen-netfront module. It
> > > seems in this case, the hotplug script is not re-executed. In fact, I
> > > think it should not be re-executed at all, since the vif interface
> > > remains in place (it just gets NO-CARRIER flag).
> > > 
> > > This brings a question, why removing hotplug-status in the first place?
> > > The interface remains correctly configured by the hotplug script after
> > > all. From the commit message:
> > > 
> > >     xen-netback: remove 'hotplug-status' once it has served its purpose
> > > 
> > >     Removing the 'hotplug-status' node in netback_remove() is wrong; the script
> > >     may not have completed. Only remove the node once the watch has fired and
> > >     has been unregistered.
> > > 
> > > I think the intention was to remove 'hotplug-status' node _later_ in
> > > case of quickly adding and removing the interface. Is that right, Paul?
> > 
> > The removal was done to allow unbind/bind to function correctly. IIRC before the original patch doing a bind would stall forever waiting for the hotplug status to change, which would never happen.
> 
> Hmm, in that case maybe don't remove it at all in the backend, and let
> it be cleaned up by the toolstack, when it removes other backend-related
> nodes?

No, unbind/bind _does_ require hotplug script to be called again.

When exactly vif interface appears in the system (starts to be available
for the hotplug script)? Maybe remove 'hotplug-status' just before that
point?


-- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)