[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWj+Tw9DzzzVj-F9AwzBN_OJV_HN2miJT4KTBH_Uei_V2ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 17:25:36 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@...lsio.com>,
Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mirko Lindner <mlindner@...vell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>,
Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sven Auhagen <sven.auhagen@...eatech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] mm: add a signature in struct page
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 17:19, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 05:11:13PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:45:32PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 03:31:15PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > > > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct page {
> > > > * 32-bit architectures.
> > > > */
> > > > unsigned long dma_addr[2];
> > > > + unsigned long signature;
> > > > };
> > > > struct { /* slab, slob and slub */
> > > > union {
> > >
> > > No. Signature now aliases with page->mapping, which is going to go
> > > badly wrong for drivers which map this page into userspace.
> > >
> > > I had this as:
> > >
> > > + unsigned long pp_magic;
> > > + unsigned long xmi;
> > > + unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
> > > unsigned long dma_addr[2];
> > >
> > > and pp_magic needs to be set to something with bits 0&1 clear and
> > > clearly isn't a pointer. I went with POISON_POINTER_DELTA + 0x40.
> >
> > Regardless to the changes required, there's another thing we'd like your
> > opinion on.
> > There was a change wrt to the previous patchset. We used to store the
> > struct xdp_mem_info into page->private. On the new version we store the
> > page_pool ptr address in page->private (there's an explanation why on the
> > mail thread, but the tl;dr is that we can get some more speed and keeping
> > xdp_mem_info is not that crucial). So since we can just store the page_pool
> > address directly, should we keep using page->private or it's better to
> > do:
> >
> > + unsigned long pp_magic;
> > + unsigned long pp_ptr;
> > + unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
> > unsigned long dma_addr[2];
> > and use pp_ptr?
>
> I'd rather you didn't use page_private ... Any reason not to use:
>
> unsigned long pp_magic;
> struct page_pool *pp;
> unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
> unsigned long dma_addr[2];
>
> ?
Nope not at all, either would work. we'll switch to that
Powered by blists - more mailing lists