[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95516cbb-1fa3-566c-62f9-ae6adcbf8fe9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:49:30 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, petrm@...dia.com,
roopa@...dia.com, nikolay@...dia.com, ssuryaextr@...il.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 02/10] ipv4: Add a sysctl to control
multipath hash fields
On 5/9/21 9:16 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> index a62934b9f15a..da627c4d633a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <net/snmp.h>
> #include <net/icmp.h>
> #include <net/ip.h>
> +#include <net/ip_fib.h>
> #include <net/route.h>
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> #include <net/udp.h>
> @@ -48,6 +49,8 @@ static int ip_ping_group_range_min[] = { 0, 0 };
> static int ip_ping_group_range_max[] = { GID_T_MAX, GID_T_MAX };
> static u32 u32_max_div_HZ = UINT_MAX / HZ;
> static int one_day_secs = 24 * 3600;
> +static u32 fib_multipath_hash_fields_all_mask __maybe_unused =
> + FIB_MULTIPATH_HASH_FIELD_ALL_MASK;
>
> /* obsolete */
> static int sysctl_tcp_low_latency __read_mostly;
> @@ -1052,6 +1055,14 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> .extra2 = &two,
> },
> + {
> + .procname = "fib_multipath_hash_fields",
> + .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_fields,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(u32),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_douintvec_minmax,
> + .extra2 = &fib_multipath_hash_fields_all_mask,
no .extra1 means 0 is allowed which effectively disables hashing and
multipath selection; only the first leg will be used. Is that intended?
> + },
> #endif
> {
> .procname = "ip_unprivileged_port_start",
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists