lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOEp5Of78_c7bGJNSCN7i+xw_N5q=MMGgr8EjnSR9moR+ugExg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 22:06:50 +0300
From:   Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Yan Vugenfirer <yan@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tun: indicate support for USO feature

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:33 AM Yuri Benditovich
<yuri.benditovich@...nix.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:50 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 在 2021/5/11 下午12:42, Yuri Benditovich 写道:
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > index 84f832806313..a35054f9d941 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > @@ -2812,7 +2812,7 @@ static int set_offload(struct tun_struct *tun, unsigned long arg)
> > >                       arg &= ~(TUN_F_TSO4|TUN_F_TSO6);
> > >               }
> > >
> > > -             arg &= ~TUN_F_UFO;
> > > +             arg &= ~(TUN_F_UFO|TUN_F_USO);
> >
> >
> > It looks to me kernel doesn't use "USO", so TUN_F_UDP_GSO_L4 is a better
> > name for this
>
> No problem, I can change it in v2
>
>  and I guess we should toggle NETIF_F_UDP_GSO_l4 here?
>
> No, we do not, because this indicates only the fact that the guest can
> send large UDP packets and have them splitted to UDP segments.
>
> >
> > And how about macvtap?
>
> We will check how to do that for macvtap. We will send a separate
> patch for macvtap or ask for advice.
>

I'll add this feature to the tap.c also (AFAIU this will enable the
USO for macvtap).
Please correct me if I'm mistaken.

> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       /* This gives the user a way to test for new features in future by
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ