[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN6QFNwPapm7Uio_jPYuCyttW5dMEGcACPUzRfNHyXt+mJhO=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 10:01:25 +1200
From: Richard Sanger <rsanger@...d.net.nz>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: packetmmap: fix only tx timestamp on request
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:24 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:32 PM Richard Sanger <rsanger@...d.net.nz> wrote:
> >
> > The packetmmap tx ring should only return timestamps if requested via
> > setsockopt PACKET_TIMESTAMP, as documented. This allows compatibility
> > with non-timestamp aware user-space code which checks
> > tp_status == TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE; not expecting additional timestamp
> > flags to be set in tp_status.
> >
> > Fixes: b9c32fb27170 ("packet: if hw/sw ts enabled in rx/tx ring, report which ts we got")
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Sanger <rsanger@...d.net.nz>
>
> Code LGTM.
>
> It would be good to capture more of the context: when these spurious
> timestamps can appear (network namespaces) and as of which commit (the
> one that changes orphaning). As is, I would not be able to understand
> the issue addressed from this commit message alone.
>
> Instead of adding context to the commit, you could also add a Link tag
> to the archived email thread, if you prefer.
>
> And perhaps: [PATCH net v3] net/packet: return software transmit
> timestamp only when requested
>
Ahh, looks like this patch has just been merged in.
For anyone looking for more details they are in this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1620085579-5646-1-git-send-email-rsanger@wand.net.nz/
>
> > ---
> > net/packet/af_packet.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > index ba96db1..ae906eb 100644
> > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > @@ -422,7 +422,8 @@ static __u32 tpacket_get_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct timespec64 *ts,
> > ktime_to_timespec64_cond(shhwtstamps->hwtstamp, ts))
> > return TP_STATUS_TS_RAW_HARDWARE;
> >
> > - if (ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, ts))
> > + if ((flags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) &&
> > + ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, ts))
> > return TP_STATUS_TS_SOFTWARE;
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -2340,7 +2341,12 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> >
> > skb_copy_bits(skb, 0, h.raw + macoff, snaplen);
> >
> > - if (!(ts_status = tpacket_get_timestamp(skb, &ts, po->tp_tstamp)))
> > + /* Always timestamp; prefer an existing software timestamp taken
> > + * closer to the time of capture.
> > + */
> > + ts_status = tpacket_get_timestamp(skb, &ts,
> > + po->tp_tstamp | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE);
> > + if (!ts_status)
> > ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
> >
> > status |= ts_status;
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists