[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210512131232.GX1955@kadam>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:12:32 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Denis Joseph Barrow <D.Barow@...ion.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@...rudhrb.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rustam Kovhaev <rkovhaev@...il.com>,
Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: hso: check for allocation failure in
hso_create_bulk_serial_device()
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:19:03PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:09:04PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Add a couple checks for if these allocations fail.
> >
> > Fixes: 542f54823614 ("tty: Modem functions for the HSO driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/usb/hso.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> > index 3ef4b2841402..3b2a868d7a72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> > @@ -2618,9 +2618,13 @@ static struct hso_device *hso_create_bulk_serial_device(
> > num_urbs = 2;
> > serial->tiocmget = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hso_tiocmget),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!serial->tiocmget)
> > + goto exit;
>
> Nice catch; the next assignment would go boom if this ever failed.
>
> This appears to have been introduced by
>
> af0de1303c4e ("usb: hso: obey DMA rules in tiocmget")
>
> > serial->tiocmget->serial_state_notification
> > = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hso_serial_state_notification),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!serial->tiocmget->serial_state_notification)
> > + goto exit;
> > /* it isn't going to break our heart if serial->tiocmget
> > * allocation fails don't bother checking this.
> > */
>
> You should remove this comment and drop the conditional on the following
> line as well now, though.
Ah, good catch. I'll resend. Thanks!
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists