[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202105141203.60B0435@keescook>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:03:50 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@...el.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com, john.johansen@...onical.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, paul@...l-moore.com,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:07:49PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Change the security_secctx_to_secid interface to use a lsmblob
> structure in place of the single u32 secid in support of
> module stacking. Change its callers to do the same.
>
> The security module hook is unchanged, still passing back a secid.
> The infrastructure passes the correct entry from the lsmblob.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
This looks like sane refactoring into the new blob type.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists