[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210515042702.82265-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 13:27:02 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
To: <kafai@...com>
CC: <andrii@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <benh@...zon.com>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/11] bpf: Test BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE.
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 19:05:15 -0700
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:44:33PM +0900, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> > index 12ee40284da0..2060bc122c53 100644
> [ ... ]
>
> > +static int setup_fastopen(char *buf, int size, int *saved_len, bool restore)
> > +{
> > + int err = 0, fd, len;
> > +
> > + fd = open("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen", O_RDWR);
> > + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(fd, -1, "open"))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + if (restore) {
> > + len = write(fd, buf, *saved_len);
> > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(len, *saved_len, "write - restore"))
> > + err = -1;
> > + } else {
> > + *saved_len = read(fd, buf, size);
> > + if (!ASSERT_GE(*saved_len, 1, "read")) {
> > + err = -1;
> > + goto close;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "lseek"))
> > + goto close;
> > +
> > + /* (TFO_CLIENT_ENABLE | TFO_SERVER_ENABLE) */
> > + len = write(fd, "3", 1);
> > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(len, 1, "write - setup"))
> Is it to trigger the tcp_try_fastopen() case?
> I am not sure it is enough. At least, I think not for the
> very first connection before the cookie is saved.
> The second run of the test may be able to trigger it.
>
> setsockopt(TCP_FASTOPEN_NO_COOKIE) or another value in the
> "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen" (ip-sysctl.rst) may be
> needed.
Ah, right. I missed that point while testing in the same host.
TFO should be always forced without cookies.
>
> > + err = -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > +close:
> > + close(fd);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_migrate_reuseport.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_migrate_reuseport.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..72978b5d1fcb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_migrate_reuseport.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Check if we can migrate child sockets.
> > + *
> > + * 1. If reuse_md->migrating_sk is NULL (SYN packet),
> > + * return SK_PASS without selecting a listener.
> > + * 2. If reuse_md->migrating_sk is not NULL (socket migration),
> > + * select a listener (reuseport_map[migrate_map[cookie]])
> > + *
> > + * Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <stddef.h>
> > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +
> > +struct {
> > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY);
> > + __uint(max_entries, 256);
> > + __type(key, int);
> > + __type(value, __u64);
> > +} reuseport_map SEC(".maps");
> > +
> > +struct {
> > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> > + __uint(max_entries, 256);
> > + __type(key, __u64);
> > + __type(value, int);
> > +} migrate_map SEC(".maps");
> > +
> > +int migrated_at_close SEC(".data");
> > +int migrated_at_send_synack SEC(".data");
> > +int migrated_at_recv_ack SEC(".data");
> int migrated_at_close = 0;
> int migrated_at_send_synack = 0;
> int migrated_at_recv_ack = 0;
>
> and then use skel->bss->migrated_at_* in migrate_reuseport.c.
I'll fix them.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists