netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] mwifiex: re-fix for unaligned accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lf8gikhp.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Sat, 15 May 2021 09:22:58 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
        Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Devidas Puranik <devidas@...vell.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] mwifiex: re-fix for unaligned accesses

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> writes:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> A patch from 2017 changed some accesses to DMA memory to use
> get_unaligned_le32() and similar interfaces, to avoid problems
> with doing unaligned accesson uncached memory.
>
> However, the change in the mwifiex_pcie_alloc_sleep_cookie_buf()
> function ended up changing the size of the access instead,
> as it operates on a pointer to u8.
>
> Change this function back to actually access the entire 32 bits.
> Note that the pointer is aligned by definition because it came
> from dma_alloc_coherent().
>
> Fixes: 92c70a958b0b ("mwifiex: fix for unaligned reads")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Via which tree should this go? I assume it will go via some other tree
so:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches