[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0pH0V_y-Ayt0rTNgZGR+Rm6tVRSzjCbo_vuA97c4shkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 11:52:59 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
kernel@...rcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net-next: xsurf100: drop include of lib8390.c
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 6:23 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Now that ax88796.c exports the ax_NS8390_reinit() symbol, we can
> include 8390.h instead of lib8390.c, avoiding duplication of that
> function and killing a few compile warnings in the bargain.
>
> Fixes: 861928f4e60e826c ("net-next: New ax88796 platform
> driver for Amiga X-Surf 100 Zorro board (m68k)")
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/8390/xsurf100.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Geert noticed that a patch I just sent is similar to this one. Since I assume
you have verified this version works, it would be nice if you could resend
both patches.
Alternatively, I can include them in my series if you like.
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/xsurf100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/xsurf100.c
> index e2c9638..1c3e8d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/xsurf100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/8390/xsurf100.c
> @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
> #define XS100_8390_DATA_WRITE32_BASE 0x0C80
> #define XS100_8390_DATA_AREA_SIZE 0x80
>
> -#define __NS8390_init ax_NS8390_init
> -
> /* force unsigned long back to 'void __iomem *' */
> #define ax_convert_addr(_a) ((void __force __iomem *)(_a))
>
> @@ -42,10 +40,11 @@
> /* Ensure we have our RCR base value */
> #define AX88796_PLATFORM
>
> -static unsigned char version[] =
> - "ax88796.c: Copyright 2005,2007 Simtec Electronics\n";
> +#define NS8390_CORE
> +#include "8390.h"
I don't see that #define being referenced anywhere, can that be dropped?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists