[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87im3hk3t2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 21:17:13 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
> On 3/18/21 10:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Commit 92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support")
>> removed the last selector of CONFIG_MV64X60.
>>
>> Therefore CONFIG_MV64X60_WDT cannot be selected anymore and
>> can be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 4 -
>> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 -
>> drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c | 324 ---------------------------------
>> include/linux/mv643xx.h | 8 -
>> 4 files changed, 337 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c
I assumed this would go via the watchdog tree, but seems like I
misinterpreted.
Should I take this via the powerpc tree for v5.14 ?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists