Message-ID: <CA+FuTSfjaqntvGGJAWc=QxWFkTPrXF+Ed9rkUKM8sor4=ZAK+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 10:05:52 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+106457891e3cf3b273a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        Tanner Love <tannerlove@...gle.com>,
        Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] KMSAN: uninit-value in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:27 AM syzbot
<syzbot+106457891e3cf3b273a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:    4ebaab5f kmsan: drop unneeded references to kmsan_context_..
> git tree:       https://github.com/google/kmsan.git master
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17ac508ed00000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ab8076fe8508c0d3
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=106457891e3cf3b273a9
> compiler:       Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=138f4972d00000
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1624ffced00000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+106457891e3cf3b273a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> =====================================================
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb+0x1414/0x14f0 include/linux/virtio_net.h:86

No answer/fix, just initial investigation.

This is an odd location. Line 86 is the inner if statement. Both
protocol and skb->protocol are clearly initialized by then. But, that
is also not the allocation that MSAN reports, see below.

                        if (!skb->protocol) {
                                __be16 protocol =
dev_parse_header_protocol(skb);

                                virtio_net_hdr_set_proto(skb, hdr);
                                if (protocol && protocol != skb->protocol)
                                        return -EINVAL;
                        }

The repro itself seems mostly straightforward:

- create a packet socket
- enable PACKET_VNET_HDR with setsockopt(r3, 0x107, 0xf ..)
- bind to AF_PACKET (0x11)

- create a pipe
- write to pipe[1]
- splice pipe[0] to the packet socket

there are a few other calls that I think are irrelevant and/or would fail.

Perhaps there is some race condition in device refcounting, as bind
operates on that?

> CPU: 0 PID: 8426 Comm: syz-executor777 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x24c/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  kmsan_report+0xfb/0x1e0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:118
>  __msan_warning+0x5c/0xa0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:197
>  virtio_net_hdr_to_skb+0x1414/0x14f0 include/linux/virtio_net.h:86
>  packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:2994 [inline]
>  packet_sendmsg+0x85b8/0x99d0 net/packet/af_packet.c:3031
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:654 [inline]
>  sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:674 [inline]
>  kernel_sendmsg+0x22c/0x2f0 net/socket.c:694
>  sock_no_sendpage+0x205/0x2b0 net/core/sock.c:2860
>  kernel_sendpage+0x47a/0x590 net/socket.c:3631
>  sock_sendpage+0x161/0x1a0 net/socket.c:947
>  pipe_to_sendpage+0x3e4/0x520 fs/splice.c:364
>  splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline]
>  __splice_from_pipe+0x5e3/0xff0 fs/splice.c:562
>  splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline]
>  generic_splice_sendpage+0x1d5/0x2c0 fs/splice.c:746
>  do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline]
>  do_splice+0x23c3/0x2c10 fs/splice.c:1079
>  __do_splice fs/splice.c:1144 [inline]
>  __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1350 [inline]
>  __se_sys_splice+0x8fa/0xb50 fs/splice.c:1332
>  __x64_sys_splice+0x6e/0x90 fs/splice.c:1332
>  do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x140 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x449a39
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 d1 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f8ed790b2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000113
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004cf518 RCX: 0000000000449a39
> RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00000000004cf510 R08: 000000000004ffe0 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004cf51c
> R13: 000000000049e46c R14: 6d32cc5e8ead0600 R15: 0000000000022000
>
> Uninit was created at:
>  kmsan_save_stack_with_flags+0x3c/0x90 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:121
>  kmsan_alloc_page+0xd0/0x1e0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_shadow.c:274
>  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x827/0xf90 mm/page_alloc.c:5044
>  alloc_pages_current+0x7b6/0xb60 mm/mempolicy.c:2277
>  alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:561 [inline]
>  alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:1653 [inline]
>  allocate_slab+0x364/0x1260 mm/slub.c:1793
>  new_slab mm/slub.c:1856 [inline]
>  new_slab_objects mm/slub.c:2602 [inline]
>  ___slab_alloc+0xd42/0x1930 mm/slub.c:2765
>  __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2805 [inline]
>  slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2886 [inline]
>  slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2931 [inline]
>  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xc53/0x1030 mm/slub.c:2948
>  kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:554 [inline]
>  kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:684 [inline]
>  ____ip_mc_inc_group+0x4d7/0x10b0 net/ipv4/igmp.c:1435

This allocates ip_mc_list, but it uses kzalloc. Can that ever count as
uninitialized?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists