[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210519125107.578f9c7d@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 12:51:07 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: saeedm@...dia.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx5: count all link events
On Wed, 19 May 2021 14:34:34 -0500 Lijun Pan wrote:
> Is it possible to integrate netif_carrier_event into netif_carrier_on? like,
>
>
> void netif_carrier_on(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> if (test_and_clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER, &dev->state)) {
> if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNINITIALIZED)
> return;
> atomic_inc(&dev->carrier_up_count);
> linkwatch_fire_event(dev);
> if (netif_running(dev))
> __netdev_watchdog_up(dev);
> } else {
> if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNINITIALIZED)
> return;
> atomic_inc(&dev->carrier_down_count);
> atomic_inc(&dev->carrier_up_count);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_carrier_on);
Ah, I meant to address that in the commit message, thanks for bringing
this up. I suspect drivers may depend on the current behavior of
netif_carrier_on()/off() being idempotent. We have no real reason for
removing that assumption.
I assumed netif_carrier_event() would be used specifically in places
driver is actually servicing a link event from the device, and
therefore is relatively certain that _something_ has happened.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists