netdev - Re: [syzbot] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aEtYPAdrU7KkE303yDw__QiG7m1tWVJewV8C_Mt9=1qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 22:09:35 +0200
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+a70a6358abd2c3f9550f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS too low! (2)

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:58 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/19/21 12:48 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:35 PM syzbot
> > <syzbot+a70a6358abd2c3f9550f@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot found the following issue on:
> >>
> >> HEAD commit:    b81ac784 net: cdc_eem: fix URL to CDC EEM 1.0 spec
> >> git tree:       net
> >> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15a257c3d00000
> >> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5b86a12e0d1933b5
> >> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a70a6358abd2c3f9550f
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
> >>
> >> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> >> Reported-by: syzbot+a70a6358abd2c3f9550f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >>
> >> BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS too low!
> >
>
> include/linux/lockdep.h
>
> #define MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS           13
> #define MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS                (1UL << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS)

Ouch, so it's not configurable yet :(
Unless, of course, we identify the offender that produced thousands of
lock classes in the log and fix it.


> Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst:
>
> Troubleshooting:
> ----------------
>
> The validator tracks a maximum of MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS number of lock classes.
> Exceeding this number will trigger the following lockdep warning::
>
>         (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(id >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS))
>
> By default, MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS is currently set to 8191, and typical
> desktop systems have less than 1,000 lock classes, so this warning
> normally results from lock-class leakage or failure to properly
> initialize locks.  These two problems are illustrated below:
>
> >
> > What config controls this? I don't see "MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS too low" in
> > any of the config descriptions...
> > Here is what syzbot used:
> >
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_BITS=16
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS=17
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_STACK_TRACE_BITS=20
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_STACK_TRACE_HASH_BITS=14
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CIRCULAR_QUEUE_BITS=12
> >
> > We already bumped most of these.
> > The log contains dump of the lockdep debug files, is there any offender?
> >
> > Also looking at the log I noticed a memory safety bug in lockdep implementation:
>
> ...
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/c545268c-fe62-883c-4c46-974b3bb3cea1%40infradead.org.