netdev - [PATCH 01/12] net/Bluetooth/bnep - use the correct print format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1621511073-47766-2-git-send-email-yekai13@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 19:44:22 +0800
From:   Kai Ye <yekai13@...wei.com>
To:     <marcel@...tmann.org>, <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yekai13@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] net/Bluetooth/bnep - use the correct print format

According to Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst,
Use the correct print format. Printing an unsigned int value should use %u
instead of %d. Otherwise printk() might end up displaying negative numbers.

Signed-off-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@...wei.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c b/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
index 43c2841..5898012 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int bnep_ctrl_set_netfilter(struct bnep_session *s, __be16 *data, int len
 			f[i].start = get_unaligned_be16(data++);
 			f[i].end   = get_unaligned_be16(data++);
 
-			BT_DBG("proto filter start %d end %d",
+			BT_DBG("proto filter start %u end %u",
 				f[i].start, f[i].end);
 		}
 
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int bnep_rx_extension(struct bnep_session *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			break;
 		}
 
-		BT_DBG("type 0x%x len %d", h->type, h->len);
+		BT_DBG("type 0x%x len %u", h->type, h->len);
 
 		switch (h->type & BNEP_TYPE_MASK) {
 		case BNEP_EXT_CONTROL:
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int bnep_tx_frame(struct bnep_session *s, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	int len = 0, il = 0;
 	u8 type = 0;
 
-	BT_DBG("skb %p dev %p type %d", skb, skb->dev, skb->pkt_type);
+	BT_DBG("skb %p dev %p type %u", skb, skb->dev, skb->pkt_type);
 
 	if (!skb->dev) {
 		/* Control frame sent by us */
-- 
2.8.1